ABSTRACT
Background@#and Purpose To examine the clinical and safety outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) with different anesthetic modalities. @*Methods@#This was a retrospective analysis using data from the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion (ATTENTION) registry. Patients were divided into two groups defined by anesthetic modality performed during EVT: general anesthesia (GA) or non-general anesthesia (non-GA). The association between anesthetic management and clinical outcomes was evaluated in a propensity score matched (PSM) cohort and an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) cohort to adjust for imbalances between the two groups. @*Results@#Our analytic sample included 1,672 patients from 48 centers. The anesthetic modality was GA in 769 (46.0%) and non-GA in 903 (54.0%) patients. In our primary analysis with the PSM-based cohort, non-GA was comparable to GA concerning the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.25; P=0.91). Mortality at 90 days was 38.4% in the GA group and 35.8% in the non-GA group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.08; P=0.44). In our secondary analysis with the IPTW-based cohort, the anesthetic modality was significantly associated with the distribution of modified Rankin Scale at 90 days (acOR: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.20 to 1.75]). @*Conclusion@#In this nationally-representative observational study, acute ischemic stroke patients due to BAO undergoing EVT without GA had similar clinical and safety outcomes compared with patients treated with GA. These findings provide the basis for large-scale randomized controlled trials to test whether anesthetic management provides meaningful clinical effects for patients undergoing EVT.
ABSTRACT
The hospital took the lead in the area to carry out stroke process improvement, including the accountability practice of the president, micro-videos for illness condition description, standardized language communication, CT-room thrombolysis, and interdisciplinary seamless corporation among others. The timespan from admission to thrombolysis ( door to needle time, DNT) has shortened significantly, scoring the median time of 25 minutes and the shortest of 8 minutes. The hospital is also the first in the area to initiate the program to bypass the emergency department and the thrombolytic treatment on the ambulance. Such bypass program keeps the DNT of emergency patients within 15 minutes.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of low-dose glucocorticoid on prognosis of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficient (CIRCI) patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).Methods A total of 385 eligible patients met the criteria of AECOPD were admitted from January 2010 to December 2012.The AECOPD patients co-morbid with CIRCI screened by an adrenal corticotrophic hormone test within 12 hours after admission were randomly divided into treatment group (n =32) and control group (n =31) for prospective,randomized (random number) and controlled clinical study.Hydrocortison (150mg/d) for treatment group or normal saline instead for control group was injected intravenously for 7 days.The 28-day mortality,shock-free days,length of ICU stay within 28 days and ventilator-free days were evaluated.And the markers of inflammation C-reactive protein,tumor necrosis factor-α,interleukin 6 and procalcitonin were measured before and 7 days after treatment.The variables were analyzed by Student' s t-test,non-parametric statistical test,Chi-square test or KaplanMeier test with SPSS 18.0 statistic software.P ＜ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results A cohort of 385 patients with AECOPD was screened,and the prevalence rate of CIRCI was 16.4％.The shock rate was higher in the AECOPD patients co-morbid with CIRCI than that in the AECOPD patients without CIRCI (23.8％ vs 8.7％,P ＜0.01).Compared with the control group,the 28-day mortality was significantly lower in treatment group (2/32 vs 8/31,P ＜ 0.05),and shock-free days within 28 days longer in the treatment group (18.2 ± 9.5 vs 25.8 ± 4.1,P ＜ 0.05).However,there was no difference in the shock rate,days of ICU stay and ventilator-free days between the two groups.After treatment,the levels of infection markers were decreased and obviously lower than those in control group (P ＜ 0.01),such as Creactive protein (13.2 ± 5.5 mg/L vs 8.3 ± 3.1 mg/L for control group; 13.5 ± 5.9 mg/L vs 5.1 ± 2.3mg/L for treatment group),tumor necrosis factor-α (26.1 ± 16.2 μg/L vs 17.5 ± 11.7 μg/L for control group ; 25.0 ± 14.8 μg/L vs 10.4 ± 7.8 μg/L for treatment group) and procalcitonin [3.88 (0.25,8.5) μg/L vs 2.03 (0.15,5.1) μg/L for control group; 3.77 (0.21,8.0) μg/L vs 1.26 (0.10,3.2) μg/L for treatment group],furthermore,the levels of infection markers were decrease more obviously in the treatment group than those in the control group (P ＜ 0.01).Conclusions There was high prevalence rate of CIRCI in the patients with AECOPD in the department of critical medicine,and low-dose glucocorticoid reduced 28-day mortality,shock days and markers of infection and inflammation.